海战

钢铁雄心 IV

海战

海军

海军单位

海军任务

海军战斗

海军科技

海军学说

海战是由舰船在世界相互连接的海洋上进行的，海上力量是保护我方交通线和破坏敌方交通线的关键。掌握制海权能够进行海军入侵，或者防止敌人利用海洋入侵。舰船也能用对岸炮击的行动影响陆上战斗，或封锁海峡以削弱敌人的行动。

由于海战是一个复杂的话题，因此分为多个章节进行讲述。 此页面充当枢纽，提供与海战有关的文章列表。

概念和理论

海军

主条目：海军

A navy is a country's collective naval force. It is divided among task forces, fleets and theaters. 海军是一个国家的集中海上力量，它分为特遣舰队，分舰队和战区。

舰船

主条目：海军单位

Navies are fundamentally composed of ships. 一个海军从根本上由舰船组成。

海军任务

主条目：Naval missions、海军任务

Naval warfare is primarily conducted through naval missions, which may be assigned to task forces. 海战主要是通过一个个海军任务进行的，海军任务通过分配特遣部队来执行。

战斗

主条目：海战、海战

When two opposing navies meet, a naval battle unfolds. 当两个敌对的海军相遇时，一场海战便展开了。

研究

科技

主条目：Naval technology、海军科技

Advances in naval technology can unlock more capable ship designs, or improve the performance of existing ships. 海军技术的进步可以解锁能力更强的舰船设计模板，或改善现有舰船的性能。

学说

主条目：Naval doctrine、海军学说

Naval doctrines provide bonuses for specific forms of naval warfare. 海军学说给各种形式的海战提供增益。

战略

This section provides naval warfare strategies which have been tested in-game for effectiveness. Strategies are not limited to instructions; the reasoning behind each strategy is also given, with links to articles in which the relevant mechanics are explained. 本章节提供了已在游戏中进行过有效性测试的海军作战策略。 策略不仅限于提供建议； 并给出了每种策略背后的原因，且提供了来源文章的链接，其中解释了相关的机制。

布雷战术

地雷具有强大的效果，并且目前AI很少关注地雷。 无论有多少枚地雷，他们至多只会进行最少的扫雷工作。 因此，通过广泛的执行布雷行动，就有可能获得超过AI的强大海军优势。 所得的制海权也可用于促进海军入侵。

由于潜艇的隐身性和低成本，因此非常适合布雷。 当潜艇编队装备了布雷管并设定了'避免交战'的规则时，编队可以几乎不受惩罚地执行布雷任务。在这种情况下，潜艇仍然容易受到海军轰炸机的攻击，并且可能会因此遭受损失，不过在实践中，AI不会对布雷用潜艇进行足够的轰炸，从而给玩家带来麻烦。

一些国家最开始就拥有从以“早期潜艇船体”为基础的原始潜艇。 将这些潜艇改装为布雷潜艇是一个使用它们的好方法，因为它们的战斗力不管再低下也不会影响其布雷的能力。

集中打击力量

由于舰船的燃料需求相对较高，因此通常合理的做法是将主力舰分配给打击舰队 打击舰队任务，以便仅在需要时才采取行动。

为了确保保护主力舰免受鱼雷的伤害，谨慎的做法是使打击部队具有足够的屏卫舰以达到完整的屏卫效率。为了使屏卫效率保持100%,每艘主力舰至少需要三艘屏卫舰，拥有更多的屏卫舰可以确保即使定位不佳或屏卫舰被摧毁了几艘也能保持较高的屏蔽效率。 每个舰队应该拥有一支以上的打击舰队，因为这样的设置将使得打击舰队可以同时拦截一支以上的敌军。

Convoy escort composition

When deciding upon the composition of convoy escort task forces, it may be helpful to consider the following points:

• The AI uses the 'engage at medium risk' engagement rule for all of its convoy raiding task forces. Submarines with this engagement rule will tend to flee from a group of defending destroyers when the battle starts, regardless of how strong or weak the destroyers are.
• To minimise convoy losses, it is important for a fleet performing convoy escort to achieve 100% escort efficiency. Escort efficiency is a function of quantity of ships rather than quality; the weakest possible destroyer will contribute exactly as much escort efficiency as a battleship would.
• High screening efficiency is helpful for protecting convoys from torpedoes during battle. As with escort efficiency, screening efficiency is a function of quantity of ships rather than quality.
• It is difficult for the defending side to detect submarines during a naval battle, even when the defending ships are equipped with sonar.
• Depth charges are ineffective against undetected submarines.

Given the above points, it is viable to use extremely cheap destroyers (early hull, level 1 battery, level 1 engine; the weakest destroyer that may be designed) for convoy escort duty. Such destroyers lack sonar and depth charge equipment and are thereby not particularly well suited for anti-submarine warfare, but convoy raiding submarines will flee from them regardless. Such destroyers can be economically produced in high numbers, providing high escort efficiency and screening efficiency to minimise the damage done to convoys.

Under this scheme, the destruction of enemy submarines would be left to patrol and/or strike forces configured for anti-submarine warfare. Such forces could be deployed to regions in which convoys had recently been attacked by submarines. The attacking side is at a significant advantage when attacking submarines, as all defending submarines will be revealed for a period of time from the start of the battle (see the naval battle article for further details).

If more expensive destroyers with sonar and/or depth charges were used for convoy escort, such destroyers would inflict slightly greater losses upon attacking submarines on average than the cheap convoy escort destroyers described earlier. However, due to their higher cost, it would be more difficult to amass such destroyers in the numbers required to achieve high escort efficiency and (in particular) high screening efficiency for each battle, which could lead to greater convoy losses. The value of expensive sonar and depth charge equipment would also be reduced in this situation, due to the difficulty of detecting submarines while on the defending side of a battle.

战争 

机制 

事件与决议

事件 • 决议